- Intelligence
- 33.7
- Rank 103 of 744 measured models
- Coding
- 71.3
- Rank 51 of 298 measured models
- Output speed
- 148 t/s
- Rank 88 of 403 measured models
- Price/1M
- $2
- Rank 466 of 659 measured models
- Context window
- 1M
- Rank 84 of 1199 measured models
- Cost per task
- $1.38
- Rank 147 of 193 measured models
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 33.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, ranking 103rd of 744 measured models. The closest models on this index are GLM-5.2 (33.7), Qwen3.8 27B (33.7), and Motif 3 (33.6). At $2 per million tokens (3:1 input/output blended price), it is cheaper than GLM-5.2 ($2.15), more expensive than Qwen3.8 27B ($1.13). With an output speed of 148 t/s, it is faster than GLM-5.2 (81.1 t/s) and Qwen3.8 27B (41.2 t/s).
Additional benchmarks16
Design Arena · 3d49.0%
Design Arena · Agenticgamedev48.3%
Design Arena · Androidnative47.3%
Design Arena · Asciiart56.0%
Design Arena · Codecategories51.2%
Design Arena · Dataviz50.4%
Design Arena · Fullstack45.4%
Design Arena · Gamedev47.9%
Design Arena · Godotgamedev39.8%
Design Arena · Htmlslides51.8%
Design Arena · Mobileapps46.3%
Design Arena · Python Pptxslides44.1%
Design Arena · Svg49.1%
Design Arena · Uicomponent51.3%
Design Arena · Webapps49.3%
Design Arena · Website51.3%
Models at a similar level
The closest models on the Intelligence Index, one configuration per family.
- JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
China Mobile · — · —
33.9+0.2——Compare - GLM-5.2
Z.AI · $2.15 · 81.1 t/s
33.7$2.1581.1 t/sCompare - Qwen3.8 27B
Alibaba · $1.13 · 41.2 t/s
33.7$1.1341.2 t/sCompare - Motif 3
Motif Technologies · — · —
33.6−0.1——Compare
