Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
- Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Step 3.7 Flash StepFun | Ling 3.0 Flash InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 19.5 | Best: 20.1 | |
| Coding | 39.6 | Best: 50.6 | |
| Agentic | — | 19.3 | |
| Speed | 82.7 t/s | Best: 321 t/s | |
| TTFT | 2.63 s | Best: 2.54 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.20×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.075 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.15×5.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.22 | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.0277 |
Intelligence
- Step 3.7 Flash
- 19.5
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: 20.1
Coding
- Step 3.7 Flash
- 39.6
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: 50.6
Agentic
- Step 3.7 Flash
- —
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- 19.3
Speed
- Step 3.7 Flash
- 82.7 t/s
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: 321 t/s
TTFT
- Step 3.7 Flash
- 2.63 s
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: 2.54 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.7 Flash
- $0.20×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: $0.075
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.7 Flash
- $1.15×5.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Best: $0.22
Context window
- Step 3.7 Flash
- 1M
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- 1M
Reasoning
- Step 3.7 Flash
- Yes
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Yes
Open weights
- Step 3.7 Flash
- Yes
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- Yes
Cost / task
- Step 3.7 Flash
- —
- Ling 3.0 Flash
- $0.0277
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Step 3.7 Flash19.5 · $0.438
- Ling 3.0 Flash20.1 · $0.111