Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.026 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.11 | — | |
| Context window | 65.5K | Best: 2M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- 6.6
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- 6.6
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- $0.026
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- $0.11
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- —
Context window
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- 65.5K
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- Best: 2M
Reasoning
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- Yes
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- Yes
Open weights
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- Yes
- Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Sarvam 30B (High)6.6 · $0.047
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24).