Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ring-1T
InclusionAI
- Trinity Large Thinking
Arcee AI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ring-1T InclusionAI | Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 10.9 | 10.8 | |
| Coding | — | 25.8 | |
| Math | 89.3 | — | |
| Agentic | — | 1 | |
| Speed | — | 346 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.1 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.25 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.80 | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 512K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.119 |
Intelligence
- Ring-1T
- Best: 10.9
- Trinity Large Thinking
- 10.8
Coding
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- 25.8
Math
- Ring-1T
- 89.3
- Trinity Large Thinking
- —
Agentic
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- 1
Speed
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- 346 t/s
TTFT
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- 1.1 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- $0.25
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- $0.80
Context window
- Ring-1T
- 128K
- Trinity Large Thinking
- Best: 512K
Reasoning
- Ring-1T
- Yes
- Trinity Large Thinking
- Yes
Open weights
- Ring-1T
- Yes
- Trinity Large Thinking
- Yes
Cost / task
- Ring-1T
- —
- Trinity Large Thinking
- $0.119
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Trinity Large Thinking10.8 · $0.119
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ring-1T.