Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) Alibaba | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 22.9 | 22.8 | |
| Speed | 75.3 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 5.59 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $2.40 | $75×31.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- Best: 22.9
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 22.8
Speed
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- 75.3 t/s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
TTFT
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- 5.59 s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- Best: $0.30
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- Best: $2.40
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×31.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- 1M
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 1M
Reasoning
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)22.9 · $0.825
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30