Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Coding | — | 11.9 | |
| Math | — | 7.7 | |
| Speed | — | 92.8 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.71 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.36 | $0.71×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.40 | $0.72×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 32.8K | Best: 128K | |
| Reasoning | — | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- 7.7
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- 7.7
Coding
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- 11.9
Math
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- 7.7
Speed
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- 92.8 t/s
TTFT
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- 1.71 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Best: $0.36
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- $0.71×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Best: $0.40
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- $0.72×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- 32.8K
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- Best: 128K
Reasoning
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- No
Open weights
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Yes
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct7.7 · $0.37
- Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B7.7 · $0.712