Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta
- Celeris-1
Celeris
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Muse Glimmer 30B Meta | Celeris-1 Celeris | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | Best: 49 | 14.4 | |
| Agentic | Best: 8.5 | 0.7 | |
| Speed | — | 1,484 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 0.57 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.20 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.70 | |
| Context window | 131K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.0502 |
Intelligence
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- 6.3
- Celeris-1
- 6.3
Coding
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Best: 49
- Celeris-1
- 14.4
Agentic
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Best: 8.5
- Celeris-1
- 0.7
Speed
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- —
- Celeris-1
- 1,484 t/s
TTFT
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- —
- Celeris-1
- 0.57 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- $0.30×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Celeris-1
- Best: $0.20
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- $1.20×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Celeris-1
- Best: $0.70
Context window
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- 131K
- Celeris-1
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Yes
- Celeris-1
- No
Open weights
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Yes
- Celeris-1
- No
Cost / task
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- —
- Celeris-1
- $0.0502
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Muse Glimmer 30B6.3 · $0.525
- Celeris-16.3 · $0.325