Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Mercury 2.5
Inception
- JT-MINI
China Mobile
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Mercury 2.5 Inception | JT-MINI China Mobile | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 12.3 | 12.2 | |
| Speed | 594 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 3.38 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.25 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.75 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 260K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | No | No | |
| Cost / task | $0.117 | — |
Intelligence
- Mercury 2.5
- Best: 12.3
- JT-MINI
- 12.2
Speed
- Mercury 2.5
- 594 t/s
- JT-MINI
- —
TTFT
- Mercury 2.5
- 3.38 s
- JT-MINI
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.25
- JT-MINI
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.75
- JT-MINI
- —
Context window
- Mercury 2.5
- Best: 260K
- JT-MINI
- 128K
Reasoning
- Mercury 2.5
- Yes
- JT-MINI
- No
Open weights
- Mercury 2.5
- No
- JT-MINI
- No
Cost / task
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.117
- JT-MINI
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Mercury 2.512.3 · $0.117
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-MINI.