Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Math | 4 | — | |
| Speed | 36.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.04 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.56×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.40 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.56×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.40 | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 131K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 6.6
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- 6.6
Math
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 4
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- —
Speed
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 36.2 t/s
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- —
TTFT
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 2.04 s
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Best: $0.40
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Best: $0.40
Context window
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 128K
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Best: 131K
Reasoning
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- No
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- No
Open weights
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- Yes
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B6.6 · $0.56
- Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct6.6 · $0.40