Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-flash-2.0
InclusionAI
- GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-flash-2.0 InclusionAI | GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.8 | 7.8 | |
| Coding | — | 11.1 | |
| Math | Best: 65.3 | 24 | |
| Speed | 4.1 t/s | Best: 216 t/s | |
| TTFT | 2.49 s | Best: 0.61 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.14×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.57×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.40 | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Ling-flash-2.0
- 7.8
- GPT-4.1 nano
- 7.8
Coding
- Ling-flash-2.0
- —
- GPT-4.1 nano
- 11.1
Math
- Ling-flash-2.0
- Best: 65.3
- GPT-4.1 nano
- 24
Speed
- Ling-flash-2.0
- 4.1 t/s
- GPT-4.1 nano
- Best: 216 t/s
TTFT
- Ling-flash-2.0
- 2.49 s
- GPT-4.1 nano
- Best: 0.61 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-flash-2.0
- $0.14×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- GPT-4.1 nano
- Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-flash-2.0
- $0.57×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- GPT-4.1 nano
- Best: $0.40
Context window
- Ling-flash-2.0
- 128K
- GPT-4.1 nano
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- Ling-flash-2.0
- No
- GPT-4.1 nano
- No
Open weights
- Ling-flash-2.0
- Yes
- GPT-4.1 nano
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ling-flash-2.07.8 · $0.247
- GPT-4.1 nano7.8 · $0.175