Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-1T
InclusionAI
- Qwen3 Coder Next
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-1T InclusionAI | Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 9.2 | 9.2 | |
| Coding | — | 36.2 | |
| Math | 71.3 | — | |
| Agentic | — | 0.9 | |
| Speed | — | 64.2 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.15 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.50 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $1.20 | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.781 |
Intelligence
- Ling-1T
- 9.2
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- 9.2
Coding
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- 36.2
Math
- Ling-1T
- 71.3
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- —
Agentic
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- 0.9
Speed
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- 64.2 t/s
TTFT
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- 1.15 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- $0.50
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- $1.20
Context window
- Ling-1T
- 128K
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- Best: 256K
Reasoning
- Ling-1T
- No
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- No
Open weights
- Ling-1T
- Yes
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- Yes
Cost / task
- Ling-1T
- —
- Qwen3 Coder Next
- $0.781
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3 Coder Next9.2 · $0.781
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-1T.