Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- JT-MINI
China Mobile
- Mercury 2.5
Inception
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | JT-MINI China Mobile | Mercury 2.5 Inception | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 12.2 | Best: 12.3 | |
| Speed | — | 594 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 3.57 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.25 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.75 | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 260K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.117 |
Intelligence
- JT-MINI
- 12.2
- Mercury 2.5
- Best: 12.3
Speed
- JT-MINI
- —
- Mercury 2.5
- 594 t/s
TTFT
- JT-MINI
- —
- Mercury 2.5
- 3.57 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- JT-MINI
- —
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.25
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- JT-MINI
- —
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.75
Context window
- JT-MINI
- 128K
- Mercury 2.5
- Best: 260K
Reasoning
- JT-MINI
- No
- Mercury 2.5
- Yes
Open weights
- JT-MINI
- No
- Mercury 2.5
- No
Cost / task
- JT-MINI
- —
- Mercury 2.5
- $0.117
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Mercury 2.512.3 · $0.117
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-MINI.