Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Coding | 9.5 | — | |
| Math | — | 4 | |
| Speed | Best: 126 t/s | 36.2 t/s | |
| TTFT | Best: 0.75 s | 2.04 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.050 | $0.56×11.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.10 | $0.56×5.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 6.6
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 6.6
Coding
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 9.5
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- —
Math
- Granite 4.1 8B
- —
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 4
Speed
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: 126 t/s
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 36.2 t/s
TTFT
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: 0.75 s
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 2.04 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: $0.050
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×11.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: $0.10
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×5.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: 131K
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 128K
Reasoning
- Granite 4.1 8B
- No
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- No
Open weights
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Yes
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Granite 4.1 8B6.6 · $0.063
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B6.6 · $0.56