Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
OpenAI
- Ring-flash-2.0
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GPT-4o (ChatGPT) OpenAI | Ring-flash-2.0 InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Math | — | 83.7 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.14 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.57 | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- 7.2
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 7.2
Math
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 83.7
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
- Ring-flash-2.0
- $0.14
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
- Ring-flash-2.0
- $0.57
Context window
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- 128K
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 128K
Reasoning
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- No
- Ring-flash-2.0
- Yes
Open weights
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- No
- Ring-flash-2.0
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ring-flash-2.07.2 · $0.247
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: GPT-4o (ChatGPT).