Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
Google
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Gemma 3 27B Instruct | Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning) Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Coding | 10.1 | — | |
| Math | Best: 20.7 | 7.3 | |
| Agentic | 0.1 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 128K | 32K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0 | — |
Intelligence
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 4.9
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- 4.9
Coding
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 10.1
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Math
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Best: 20.7
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- 7.3
Agentic
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- 0.1
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Context window
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Best: 128K
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- 32K
Reasoning
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- No
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- Yes
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
Cost / task
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct
- $0
- Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 3 27B Instruct4.9 · $0
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning).