Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)
Google
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
LG AI Research

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) Google	EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) LG AI Research
Intelligence	13.1	Best: 13.2
Coding	—	23.6
Math	73.3	—
Speed	206 t/s	—
TTFT	18.1 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.30	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$2.50	—
Context window	Best: 1M	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes

Intelligence

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): 13.1
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Best: 13.2

Coding

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): —
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): 23.6

Math

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): 73.3
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —

Speed

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): 206 t/s
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —

TTFT

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): 18.1 s
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): $0.30
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): $2.50
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —

Context window

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): Best: 1M
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): 262K

Reasoning

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): Yes
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): No
EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)13.1 · $0.85

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning).