Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 9.3 | 9.2 | |
| Math | 46.7 | Best: 71.3 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.40 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 9.3
- Ling-1T
- 9.2
Math
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- 46.7
- Ling-1T
- Best: 71.3
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- $0.10
- Ling-1T
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- $0.40
- Ling-1T
- —
Context window
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 1M
- Ling-1T
- 128K
Reasoning
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Ling-1T
- No
Open weights
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Ling-1T
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)9.3 · $0.175
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-1T.