Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)
LG AI Research
GPT-5 nano (High)
OpenAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) LG AI Research	GPT-5 nano (High) OpenAI
Intelligence	Best: 13.2	13
Coding	23.6	—
Math	—	83.7
Speed	—	159 t/s
TTFT	—	70.7 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.050
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.40
Context window	262K	Best: 400K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Best: 13.2
GPT-5 nano (High): 13

Coding

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): 23.6
GPT-5 nano (High): —

Math

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —
GPT-5 nano (High): 83.7

Speed

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —
GPT-5 nano (High): 159 t/s

TTFT

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —
GPT-5 nano (High): 70.7 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —
GPT-5 nano (High): $0.050

Output · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): —
GPT-5 nano (High): $0.40

Context window

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): 262K
GPT-5 nano (High): Best: 400K

Reasoning

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Yes
GPT-5 nano (High): Yes

Open weights

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): Yes
GPT-5 nano (High): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-5 nano (High)13 · $0.138

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning).