Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research
Muse Glimmer (High)
Meta

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) LG AI Research	Muse Glimmer (High) Meta
Intelligence	6.3	6.3
Coding	—	49
Math	39.3	—
Agentic	—	8.5
Speed	—	120 t/s
TTFT	—	1.17 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$1.20
Context window	131K	131K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.161

Intelligence

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): 6.3
Muse Glimmer (High): 6.3

Coding

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): 49

Math

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): 39.3
Muse Glimmer (High): —

Agentic

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): 8.5

Speed

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): 120 t/s

TTFT

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): 1.17 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): $1.20

Context window

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): 131K
Muse Glimmer (High): 131K

Reasoning

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): No
Muse Glimmer (High): Yes

Open weights

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): Yes
Muse Glimmer (High): Yes

Cost / task

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): —
Muse Glimmer (High): $0.161

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Muse Glimmer (High)6.3 · $0.161

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning).