Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
DeepSeek
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning) DeepSeek | Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 16.6 | 16.6 | |
| Math | Best: 87.7 | 36.3 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.28 | $15×53.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.42 | $75×179 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 200K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- 16.6
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 16.6
Math
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- Best: 87.7
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 36.3
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- Best: $0.28
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×53.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- Best: $0.42
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×179 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- 128K
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 200K
Reasoning
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Reasoning)16.6 · $0.315
- Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)16.6 · $30