Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Trinity Large Thinking
Arcee AI
Mercury 2
Inception

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI	Mercury 2 Inception
Intelligence	10.8	10.8
Coding	25.8	Best: 31.1
Agentic	1	Best: 1.6
Speed	346 t/s	Best: 460 t/s
TTFT	Best: 1.1 s	6.17 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.25	$0.25
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$0.80×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.75
Context window	Best: 512K	128K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	No
Cost / task	$0.119×3.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.0386

Intelligence

Trinity Large Thinking: 10.8
Mercury 2: 10.8

Coding

Trinity Large Thinking: 25.8
Mercury 2: Best: 31.1

Agentic

Trinity Large Thinking: 1
Mercury 2: Best: 1.6

Speed

Trinity Large Thinking: 346 t/s
Mercury 2: Best: 460 t/s

TTFT

Trinity Large Thinking: Best: 1.1 s
Mercury 2: 6.17 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Trinity Large Thinking: $0.25
Mercury 2: $0.25

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Trinity Large Thinking: $0.80×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Mercury 2: Best: $0.75

Context window

Trinity Large Thinking: Best: 512K
Mercury 2: 128K

Reasoning

Trinity Large Thinking: Yes
Mercury 2: Yes

Open weights

Trinity Large Thinking: Yes
Mercury 2: No

Cost / task

Trinity Large Thinking: $0.119×3.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Mercury 2: Best: $0.0386

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Trinity Large Thinking10.8 · $0.119
Mercury 210.8 · $0.0386