Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Step 3.7 Flash StepFun	Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) Alibaba
Intelligence	Best: 19.5	19.3
Coding	Best: 39.6	37
Speed	Best: 185 t/s	147 t/s
TTFT	2.53 s	Best: 2.08 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.20	$0.25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.15	$2×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	262K	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Step 3.7 Flash: Best: 19.5
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): 19.3

Coding

Step 3.7 Flash: Best: 39.6
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): 37

Speed

Step 3.7 Flash: Best: 185 t/s
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): 147 t/s

TTFT

Step 3.7 Flash: 2.53 s
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): Best: 2.08 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Step 3.7 Flash: Best: $0.20
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): $0.25×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Step 3.7 Flash: Best: $1.15
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): $2×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Step 3.7 Flash: 262K
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): 262K

Reasoning

Step 3.7 Flash: Yes
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Step 3.7 Flash: Yes
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning): Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Step 3.7 Flash19.5 · $0.438
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)19.3 · $0.688