Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
- Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Step 3.5 Flash StepFun | Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 16.6 | 16.6 | |
| Coding | — | 42.8 | |
| Agentic | — | 10.7 | |
| Speed | Best: 127 t/s | 117 t/s | |
| TTFT | Best: 3.31 s | 3.72 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.10 | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 256K | Best: 262K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.287 |
Intelligence
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 16.6
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 16.6
Coding
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 42.8
Agentic
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 10.7
Speed
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: 127 t/s
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 117 t/s
TTFT
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: 3.31 s
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 3.72 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: $0.10
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: $0.30
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 256K
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Best: 262K
Reasoning
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
Open weights
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
Cost / task
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $0.287
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Step 3.5 Flash16.6 · $0.15
- Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85