Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
- Ling-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 StepFun | Ling-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 17 | 17 | |
| Speed | 142 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 3.33 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.10 | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 256K | Best: 262K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 17
- Ling-2.6-1T
- 17
Speed
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 142 t/s
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
TTFT
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 3.33 s
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.10
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.30
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 256K
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Best: 262K
Reasoning
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
- Ling-2.6-1T
- No
Open weights
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- No
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Step 3.5 Flash 260317 · $0.15
- Ling-2.6-1T17 · $0.85