Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 StepFun | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 17 | 16.7 | |
| Coding | — | 39.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 2.9 | |
| Speed | Best: 142 t/s | 65.6 t/s | |
| TTFT | 3.33 s | Best: 0.98 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $0.40×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 256K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: 17
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 16.7
Coding
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 39.3
Agentic
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 2.9
Speed
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: 142 t/s
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 65.6 t/s
TTFT
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 3.33 s
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Best: 0.98 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- $0.10
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.30
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- $0.40×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 256K
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 256K
Reasoning
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Open weights
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- No
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Step 3.5 Flash 260317 · $0.15
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)16.7 · $0.175