Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| Math | Best: 61.3 | 41.3 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.28 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $1.10 | |
| Context window | 65.5K | Best: 131K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- 7.5
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- 7.5
Math
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- Best: 61.3
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- 41.3
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- —
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- $0.28
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- —
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- $1.10
Context window
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- 65.5K
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- Best: 131K
Reasoning
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- Yes
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- No
Open weights
- Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- No
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B7.5 · $0.485
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning).