Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Coding | — | 9.5 | |
| Speed | — | 126 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 0.75 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.026 | $0.050×1.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.11×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Context window | 65.5K | Best: 131K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- 6.6
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 6.6
Coding
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- —
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 9.5
Speed
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- —
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 126 t/s
TTFT
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- —
- Granite 4.1 8B
- 0.75 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- Best: $0.026
- Granite 4.1 8B
- $0.050×1.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- $0.11×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: $0.10
Context window
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- 65.5K
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Best: 131K
Reasoning
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- Yes
- Granite 4.1 8B
- No
Open weights
- Sarvam 30B (High)
- Yes
- Granite 4.1 8B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Sarvam 30B (High)6.6 · $0.047
- Granite 4.1 8B6.6 · $0.063