Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ring-flash-2.0
InclusionAI
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
OpenAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ring-flash-2.0 InclusionAI | GPT-4o (ChatGPT) OpenAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Math | 83.7 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.14 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.57 | — | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 7.2
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- 7.2
Math
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 83.7
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-flash-2.0
- $0.14
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-flash-2.0
- $0.57
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- —
Context window
- Ring-flash-2.0
- 128K
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- 128K
Reasoning
- Ring-flash-2.0
- Yes
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- No
Open weights
- Ring-flash-2.0
- Yes
- GPT-4o (ChatGPT)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ring-flash-2.07.2 · $0.247
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: GPT-4o (ChatGPT).