Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
- Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Step 3.5 Flash StepFun | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 16.6 | 16.6 | |
| Coding | 42.8 | — | |
| Agentic | 10.7 | — | |
| Speed | 117 t/s | Best: 127 t/s | |
| TTFT | 3.72 s | Best: 3.31 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.287 | — |
Intelligence
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 16.6
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 16.6
Coding
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 42.8
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
Agentic
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 10.7
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
Speed
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 117 t/s
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: 127 t/s
TTFT
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 3.72 s
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: 3.31 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Best: $0.30
Context window
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Best: 262K
- Step 3.5 Flash
- 256K
Reasoning
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
Open weights
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash
- Yes
Cost / task
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $0.287
- Step 3.5 Flash
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85
- Step 3.5 Flash16.6 · $0.15