Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI	Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	16.6	16.6
Coding	42.8	—
Math	—	36.3
Agentic	10.7	—
Speed	117 t/s	—
TTFT	3.72 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.30	$15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $2.50	$75×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	Best: 262K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	Yes	No
Cost / task	$0.287	—

Intelligence

Ring-2.6-1T: 16.6
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 16.6

Coding

Ring-2.6-1T: 42.8
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Math

Ring-2.6-1T: —
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 36.3

Agentic

Ring-2.6-1T: 10.7
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Speed

Ring-2.6-1T: 117 t/s
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

TTFT

Ring-2.6-1T: 3.72 s
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Ring-2.6-1T: Best: $0.30
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Ring-2.6-1T: Best: $2.50
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Ring-2.6-1T: Best: 262K
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

Ring-2.6-1T: Yes
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

Ring-2.6-1T: Yes
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Cost / task

Ring-2.6-1T: $0.287
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)16.6 · $30