Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Beam 1.0
Reflection
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Alibaba

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Beam 1.0 Reflection	Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) Alibaba
Intelligence	17.7	17.7
Coding	—	45.7
Agentic	—	7.6
Cyber Index	33.7%	—
Speed	Best: 342 t/s	128 t/s
TTFT	Best: 0.77 s	2.3 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.40	$0.40
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.20	$3.20×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	Best: $0.284	$0.325×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Intelligence

Beam 1.0: 17.7
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 17.7

Coding

Beam 1.0: —
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 45.7

Agentic

Beam 1.0: —
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 7.6

Cyber Index

Beam 1.0: 33.7%
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): —

Speed

Beam 1.0: Best: 342 t/s
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 128 t/s

TTFT

Beam 1.0: Best: 0.77 s
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 2.3 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Beam 1.0: $0.40
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): $0.40

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Beam 1.0: Best: $1.20
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): $3.20×2.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Beam 1.0: 1M
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 1M

Reasoning

Beam 1.0: Yes
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Beam 1.0: Yes
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): Yes

Cost / task

Beam 1.0: Best: $0.284
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): $0.325×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Beam 1.017.7 · $0.284
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)17.7 · $0.325