Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Beam 1.0
Reflection
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Beam 1.0 Reflection | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 30.3 | 30.1 | |
| Coding | — | 63 | |
| Agentic | — | 31.8 | |
| Cyber Index | 33.7% | — | |
| Speed | 228 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.33 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.70 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.10 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | — | |
| Cost / task | $0.566 | — |
Intelligence
- Beam 1.0
- Best: 30.3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- 30.1
Coding
- Beam 1.0
- —
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- 63
Agentic
- Beam 1.0
- —
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- 31.8
Cyber Index
- Beam 1.0
- 33.7%
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Speed
- Beam 1.0
- 228 t/s
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
TTFT
- Beam 1.0
- 1.33 s
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Beam 1.0
- $0.70
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Beam 1.0
- $2.10
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Context window
- Beam 1.0
- 1M
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- 1M
Reasoning
- Beam 1.0
- Yes
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- Yes
Open weights
- Beam 1.0
- Yes
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Cost / task
- Beam 1.0
- $0.566
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Beam 1.030.3 · $0.566
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch).