Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GLM-4.5-Air
Z.AI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GLM-4.5-Air Z.AI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 11.2 | 11.1 | |
| Coding | 17.4 | — | |
| Math | — | 80.7 | |
| Speed | — | 73.7 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 2.42 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.15 | $0.17×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.98 | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Best: 11.2
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 11.1
Coding
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- 17.4
- GLM-4.5-Air
- —
Math
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 80.7
Speed
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 73.7 t/s
TTFT
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 2.42 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Best: $0.15
- GLM-4.5-Air
- $0.17×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- $1.20×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Best: $0.98
Context window
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Best: 262K
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 128K
Reasoning
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Yes
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Yes
Open weights
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
- Yes
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking11.2 · $0.413
- GLM-4.5-Air11.1 · $0.372