Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Alibaba
GLM-5 (Reasoning)
Z.AI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) Alibaba	GLM-5 (Reasoning) Z.AI
Intelligence	27.6	Best: 27.9
Coding	56.1	—
Agentic	44.4	—
Speed	43.2 t/s	Best: 71 t/s
TTFT	3.96 s	Best: 1.71 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.50	$1×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $3	$3.20×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	Best: 256K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	$1.13	—

Intelligence

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): 27.6
GLM-5 (Reasoning): Best: 27.9

Coding

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): 56.1
GLM-5 (Reasoning): —

Agentic

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): 44.4
GLM-5 (Reasoning): —

Speed

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): 43.2 t/s
GLM-5 (Reasoning): Best: 71 t/s

TTFT

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): 3.96 s
GLM-5 (Reasoning): Best: 1.71 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): Best: $0.50
GLM-5 (Reasoning): $1×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): Best: $3
GLM-5 (Reasoning): $3.20×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): Best: 256K
GLM-5 (Reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): Yes
GLM-5 (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): Yes
GLM-5 (Reasoning): Yes

Cost / task

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium): $1.13
GLM-5 (Reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)27.6 · $1.13
GLM-5 (Reasoning)27.9 · $1.55