Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Alibaba
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Z.AI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Qwen3.8 27B (Low) Alibaba	GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) Z.AI
Intelligence	Best: 26.2	26.1
Coding	Best: 58.2	55.8
Agentic	Best: 38.9	23.9
Speed	45.5 t/s	Best: 66.5 t/s
TTFT	3.87 s	Best: 1.7 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.50	$1.29×2.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $3	$4.07×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	Best: 256K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	$1.05	Best: $1.02

Intelligence

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: 26.2
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 26.1

Coding

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: 58.2
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 55.8

Agentic

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: 38.9
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 23.9

Speed

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): 45.5 t/s
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Best: 66.5 t/s

TTFT

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): 3.87 s
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Best: 1.7 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: $0.50
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): $1.29×2.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: $3
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): $4.07×1.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Best: 256K
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Yes
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): Yes
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Yes

Cost / task

Qwen3.8 27B (Low): $1.05
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): Best: $1.02

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3.8 27B (Low)26.2 · $1.05
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)26.1 · $1.02