Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Alibaba
- Apodex 1.1
Apodex
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) Alibaba | Apodex 1.1 Apodex | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 26.2 | Best: 26.4 | |
| Coding | 58.2 | Best: 60.8 | |
| Agentic | Best: 38.9 | 28.4 | |
| Speed | 45.5 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 3.87 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.50×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $3 | $3 | |
| Context window | 256K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | $1.05×2.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.464 |
Intelligence
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- 26.2
- Apodex 1.1
- Best: 26.4
Coding
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- 58.2
- Apodex 1.1
- Best: 60.8
Agentic
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- Best: 38.9
- Apodex 1.1
- 28.4
Speed
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- 45.5 t/s
- Apodex 1.1
- —
TTFT
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- 3.87 s
- Apodex 1.1
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- $0.50×1.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Apodex 1.1
- Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- $3
- Apodex 1.1
- $3
Context window
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- 256K
- Apodex 1.1
- 256K
Reasoning
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- Yes
- Apodex 1.1
- Yes
Open weights
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- Yes
- Apodex 1.1
- No
Cost / task
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
- $1.05×2.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Apodex 1.1
- Best: $0.464
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low)26.2 · $1.05
- Apodex 1.126.4 · $0.464