Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Alibaba
- Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Alibaba | Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 39.9 | Best: 40.2 | |
| Coding | Best: 71.9 | 71.8 | |
| Agentic | Best: 50.1 | 49.1 | |
| Cyber Index | 12.6% | — | |
| Speed | 39.5 t/s | Best: 40.1 t/s | |
| TTFT | 2.96 s | Best: 2.63 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $2 | $2 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $6 | $6 | |
| Context window | 262K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | Best: $2.16 | $2.67×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models |
Intelligence
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- 39.9
- Qwen3.8 Max
- Best: 40.2
Coding
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Best: 71.9
- Qwen3.8 Max
- 71.8
Agentic
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Best: 50.1
- Qwen3.8 Max
- 49.1
Cyber Index
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- 12.6%
- Qwen3.8 Max
- —
Speed
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- 39.5 t/s
- Qwen3.8 Max
- Best: 40.1 t/s
TTFT
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- 2.96 s
- Qwen3.8 Max
- Best: 2.63 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- $2
- Qwen3.8 Max
- $2
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- $6
- Qwen3.8 Max
- $6
Context window
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- 262K
- Qwen3.8 Max
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Yes
- Qwen3.8 Max
- Yes
Open weights
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Yes
- Qwen3.8 Max
- No
Cost / task
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Best: $2.16
- Qwen3.8 Max
- $2.67×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B39.9 · $2.16
- Qwen3.8 Max40.2 · $2.67