Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) Alibaba	Ling 3.0 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	19.8	Best: 20.1
Coding	46.6	Best: 50.6
Agentic	—	19.3
Speed	55.5 t/s	Best: 290 t/s
TTFT	3.69 s	Best: 2.83 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.60×8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.075
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$3.60×16.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.22
Context window	262K	262K
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 19.8
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: 20.1

Coding

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 46.6
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: 50.6

Agentic

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): —
Ling 3.0 Flash: 19.3

Speed

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 55.5 t/s
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: 290 t/s

TTFT

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 3.69 s
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: 2.83 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): $0.60×8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: $0.075

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): $3.60×16.4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.0 Flash: Best: $0.22

Context window

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 262K
Ling 3.0 Flash: 262K

Reasoning

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): No
Ling 3.0 Flash: Yes

Open weights

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): Yes
Ling 3.0 Flash: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)19.8 · $1.35
Ling 3.0 Flash20.1 · $0.111