Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803
LG AI Research

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) Alibaba	K-EXAONE 2.0 0803 LG AI Research
Intelligence	Best: 19.8	19.7
Coding	Best: 46.6	40.6
Speed	55.5 t/s	—
TTFT	3.69 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.60	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$3.60	—
Context window	262K	—
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: 19.8
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: 19.7

Coding

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: 46.6
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: 40.6

Speed

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 55.5 t/s
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: —

TTFT

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 3.69 s
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): $0.60
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): $3.60
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: —

Context window

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 262K
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: —

Reasoning

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): No
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: Yes

Open weights

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): Yes
K-EXAONE 2.0 0803: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)19.8 · $1.35

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: K-EXAONE 2.0 0803.