Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
- G9v3-39A5B
AI9Stars
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) Alibaba | G9v3-39A5B AI9Stars | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 21.4 | Best: 21.8 | |
| Coding | Best: 53.7 | 33.1 | |
| Agentic | 18.5 | — | |
| Speed | 55.6 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 3.68 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.60 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $3.60 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 131K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.621 | — |
Intelligence
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- 21.4
- G9v3-39A5B
- Best: 21.8
Coding
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- Best: 53.7
- G9v3-39A5B
- 33.1
Agentic
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- 18.5
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
Speed
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- 55.6 t/s
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
TTFT
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- 3.68 s
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- $0.60
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- $3.60
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
Context window
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- Best: 262K
- G9v3-39A5B
- 131K
Reasoning
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- G9v3-39A5B
- Yes
Open weights
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- Yes
- G9v3-39A5B
- Yes
Cost / task
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- $0.621
- G9v3-39A5B
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)21.4 · $0.621
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: G9v3-39A5B.