Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
LongCat 2.0
LongCat

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) Alibaba	LongCat 2.0 LongCat
Intelligence	Best: 19.4	19.1
Coding	—	45.3
Agentic	—	14
Speed	Best: 83.7 t/s	69.2 t/s
TTFT	5.71 s	Best: 2.64 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.30	$0.75×2.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $2.40	$2.95×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	262K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes
Cost / task	—	$0.146

Intelligence

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: 19.4
LongCat 2.0: 19.1

Coding

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): —
LongCat 2.0: 45.3

Agentic

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): —
LongCat 2.0: 14

Speed

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: 83.7 t/s
LongCat 2.0: 69.2 t/s

TTFT

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): 5.71 s
LongCat 2.0: Best: 2.64 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: $0.30
LongCat 2.0: $0.75×2.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): Best: $2.40
LongCat 2.0: $2.95×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): 262K
LongCat 2.0: Best: 1M

Reasoning

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): No
LongCat 2.0: Yes

Open weights

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): Yes
LongCat 2.0: Yes

Cost / task

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning): —
LongCat 2.0: $0.146

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)19.4 · $0.825
LongCat 2.019.1 · $1.30