Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Math | Best: 21.7 | 4 | |
| Speed | Best: 98.7 t/s | 36.7 t/s | |
| TTFT | Best: 0.59 s | 1.98 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.12 | $0.56×4.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.50 | $0.56×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 33K | Best: 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- 6.6
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 6.6
Math
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 21.7
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 4
Speed
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 98.7 t/s
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 36.7 t/s
TTFT
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 0.59 s
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- 1.98 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.12
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×4.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.50
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- $0.56×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- 33K
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- Best: 128K
Reasoning
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- No
Open weights
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)6.6 · $0.215
- Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B6.6 · $0.56