Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Allen Institute for AI
- Command A
Cohere
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Olmo 3.1 32B Think Allen Institute for AI | Command A Cohere | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 7.1 | 7 | |
| Coding | — | 27.8 | |
| Math | Best: 77.3 | 13 | |
| Agentic | — | 1 | |
| Speed | — | 62.4 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 1.7 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $2.50 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $10 | |
| Context window | 66K | Best: 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- Best: 7.1
- Command A
- 7
Coding
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- 27.8
Math
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- Best: 77.3
- Command A
- 13
Agentic
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- 1
Speed
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- 62.4 t/s
TTFT
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- 1.7 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- $2.50
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- —
- Command A
- $10
Context window
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- 66K
- Command A
- Best: 256K
Reasoning
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- Yes
- Command A
- No
Open weights
- Olmo 3.1 32B Think
- Yes
- Command A
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Command A7 · $4.38
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Olmo 3.1 32B Think.