Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- o4 Mini (batch)
OpenAI
- Ring-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | o4 Mini (batch) OpenAI | Ring-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 16.7 | 16.6 | |
| Coding | — | 42.8 | |
| Agentic | — | 10.7 | |
| Speed | — | 121 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 3.86 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.55×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $2.20 | $2.50×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 200K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | — | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.287 |
Intelligence
- o4 Mini (batch)
- Best: 16.7
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 16.6
Coding
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 42.8
Agentic
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 10.7
Speed
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 121 t/s
TTFT
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- 3.86 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- o4 Mini (batch)
- $0.55×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- o4 Mini (batch)
- Best: $2.20
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $2.50×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- o4 Mini (batch)
- 200K
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- o4 Mini (batch)
- Yes
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
Open weights
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- Yes
Cost / task
- o4 Mini (batch)
- —
- Ring-2.6-1T
- $0.287
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- o4 Mini (batch)16.7 · $0.963
- Ring-2.6-1T16.6 · $0.85