Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

o4-mini (High)
OpenAI
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	o4-mini (High) OpenAI	Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	Best: 16.7	16.6
Math	Best: 90.7	36.3
Speed	139 t/s	—
TTFT	19.1 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.10	$15×13.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $4.40	$75×17 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	200K	200K
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	No	No

Intelligence

o4-mini (High): Best: 16.7
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 16.6

Math

o4-mini (High): Best: 90.7
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 36.3

Speed

o4-mini (High): 139 t/s
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

TTFT

o4-mini (High): 19.1 s
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

o4-mini (High): Best: $1.10
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×13.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

o4-mini (High): Best: $4.40
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×17 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

o4-mini (High): 200K
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

o4-mini (High): Yes
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

o4-mini (High): No
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

o4-mini (High)16.7 · $1.93
Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)16.6 · $30