Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.4 | 7.4 | |
| Math | 69.7 | — | |
| Speed | 207 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 0.56 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.040 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.16 | — | |
| Context window | 131K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- 7.4
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- 7.4
Math
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- 69.7
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- —
Speed
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- 207 t/s
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- —
TTFT
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- 0.56 s
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- $0.040
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- $0.16
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- —
Context window
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- 131K
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- No
Open weights
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)
- Yes
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning)7.4 · $0.070
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite (Feb '25).