Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 1.8 | Best: 3.8 | |
| Coding | Best: 8 | 5.8 | |
| Math | — | 18.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 0.1 | |
| Speed | — | 52.6 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 2.94 s | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | — | $0 |
Intelligence
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- 1.8
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- Best: 3.8
Coding
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Best: 8
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 5.8
Math
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- —
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 18.3
Agentic
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- —
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 0.1
Speed
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- —
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 52.6 t/s
TTFT
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- —
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 2.94 s
Context window
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Best: 262K
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- 128K
Reasoning
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Yes
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- No
Open weights
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Yes
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- Yes
Cost / task
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- —
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct
- $0
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemma 3 12B Instruct3.8 · $0
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B.