Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 8.7 | 8.7 | |
| Coding | — | 25.5 | |
| Math | 33.7 | — | |
| Speed | 167 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.18 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.33 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.75 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | Best: 2M | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 8.7
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- 8.7
Coding
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- 25.5
Math
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 33.7
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Speed
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 167 t/s
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
TTFT
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 1.18 s
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- $0.33
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- $2.75
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- —
Context window
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- 1M
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- Best: 2M
Reasoning
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- No
Open weights
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Nova 2.0 Lite (Non-reasoning)8.7 · $0.935
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25).