Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
NVIDIA
- Claude 2.0
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA | Claude 2.0 Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Coding | Best: 26.8 | 12.9 | |
| Agentic | 3.5 | — | |
| Speed | 292 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 0.59 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.060 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.20 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 100K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | $0.29 | — |
Intelligence
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- 5.5
- Claude 2.0
- 5.5
Coding
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- Best: 26.8
- Claude 2.0
- 12.9
Agentic
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- 3.5
- Claude 2.0
- —
Speed
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- 292 t/s
- Claude 2.0
- —
TTFT
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- 0.59 s
- Claude 2.0
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- $0.060
- Claude 2.0
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- $0.20
- Claude 2.0
- —
Context window
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- Best: 1M
- Claude 2.0
- 100K
Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- Yes
- Claude 2.0
- No
Open weights
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- Yes
- Claude 2.0
- No
Cost / task
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- $0.29
- Claude 2.0
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning5.5 · $0.29
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude 2.0.