Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 43.6 | 41.1 | |
| Speed | 152 t/s | Best: 212 t/s | |
| TTFT | 35.7 s | Best: 1.84 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $4×13.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $20×22.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.90 | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $6.95×6.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $1.01 |
Intelligence
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- Best: 43.6
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 41.1
Speed
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- 152 t/s
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Best: 212 t/s
TTFT
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- 35.7 s
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Best: 1.84 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- $4×13.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- $20×22.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Best: $0.90
Context window
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- 1M
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 1M
Reasoning
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- Yes
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Yes
Open weights
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- No
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Yes
Cost / task
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- $6.95×6.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Best: $1.01
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Muse Wonder (Max)43.6 · $6.95
- Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $1.01